SCHOOL LAW STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES CASES AND LEGAL JURISDICTIONS Essay

SCHOOL LAW STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES CASES AND LEGAL JURISDICTIONS - Essay Examplerelated services designed to meet their queer needs and prepare them for employment and independent living (2) ensure the rights of such children and their parents are protected and (3) assist states and localities in providing educational services to meet these legitimate requirements.Meeting these requirements has imposed signal burdens over the years on states, municipalities, and local school districts. Likewise, providing specific definition to those requirements has fallen to Congress, the U.S. Department of pedagogics, and the Courts. This report describes the IDEA in its most recent configuration, discusses certain salient issues relating to state, municipal, and local responsibility, reviews applicable court cases, and suggests problem areas still in need of resolution.IDEA is the successor to the Education of every Handicapped Children Act (or EAHCA, Public Law 94-142, November 29, 1975). In its statement of findings and purpose, the Act established that all children shall have available to them a free appropriate human race education which emphasizes special education and related services designed to meet their unique needs PL 94-142. The Act was not sui generis. According to Apling, PL 94-142) was enacted in 1975 in resolution to increased awareness of the need to educate children with disabilities and to judicial decisions requiring that states provide education for children with disabilities if they provided an education for children without disabilities pp 1-2.The most commonly cited antecedent cases were PARC v. State of Pennsylvania, 343 F.Supp. 279 (E.D. Pa. 1972) and Mills v. Board of Education of the District of Columbia, 348 F.Supp. 866 (D.D.C. 1972), both decisions having been rendered in Federal district court. However, In Smith v. Robinson 468 U.S. 992, 1984, the Supreme Court described the statute as a comprehensive system set up by Congress to ai d the States in complying with the constitutional